Overview

MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

9.7

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

84.3 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

97.5 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 84.3%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 4.0 3.7 4.8 4.1 3.0 4.7 8.3 32.5 85.6% 1
Article, other NA NA NA NA 0.2 0.1 NA 0.4 100.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review 0.3 NA 2.3 0.6 0.2 0.2 1.4 5.1 75.5% 1
Doctoral thesis 1.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 0.0% 0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 11 11 11 9 7 11 20 80 86.2% 1
Article, other NA NA NA NA 1 1 NA 2 100.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review 1 NA 4 2 1 1 4 13 76.9% 1
Doctoral thesis 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 3.2 5.6 1.8 1.1 33.9%
2015 3.2 4.6 1.5 0.8 26.4%
2016 5.9 5.4 0.9 2.5 42.3%
2017 4.3 10.2 2.3 2.1 48.1%
2018 2.5 13.3 5.4 0.8 33.7%
Total 19.1 39.1 2.1 7.3 38.4%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 9.1 0.46 0.0 0.0%
2015-2017 10.5 0.51 0.5 4.8%
2016-2018 9.8 0.83 1.2 12.7%
2017-2019 10.2 0.75 1.2 12.2%
Total 19.3 0.61 1.2 6.5%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 73.3%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 23 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 79.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 9.1 0.92 1.4 15.1%
2015-2017 10.5 0.86 1.9 18.3%
2016-2018 9.8 0.84 1.7 17.0%
2017-2019 10.2 0.95 2.6 25.7%
2018-2020 14.1 0.89 2.0 13.9%
Total 27.0 0.91 4.5 16.5%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 23 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 79.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 25 0 0.0% 17 68.0%
2015-2017 26 0 0.0% 18 69.2%
2016-2018 22 1 4.5% 14 63.6%
2017-2019 23 1 4.3% 14 60.9%
2018-2020 34 1 2.9% 22 64.7%
Total 67 1 1.5% 45 67.2%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 22 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 81.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
United States 10 10 0 0 0 3.6
Austria 9 9 0 0 0 3.2
France 9 9 0 0 0 3.2
United Arab Emirates 9 9 0 0 0 2.7
China 8 8 0 0 0 2.4
Finland 8 8 0 0 0 2.2
Japan 5 5 0 0 0 1.4
Canada 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
Germany 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
Saudi Arabia 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
Korea, Republic of 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Netherlands 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
India 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Algeria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Denmark 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Norway 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
New York University Abu Dhabi (NYUAD) University United Arab Emirates 9 9 0 0 0 2.7
Institute of Science and Technology Austria Institute Austria 6 6 0 0 0 2.2
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology University China 5 5 0 0 0 1.7
Abo Akademi University University Finland 6 6 0 0 0 1.6
University of Helsinki University Finland 6 6 0 0 0 1.6
Telecom SudParis University College France 4 4 0 0 0 1.5
Uppsala University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.5
OSAKA PREFECTURE UNIVERSITY University Japan 4 4 0 0 0 1.1
University of Le Mans University France 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
University of Vienna University Austria 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
Brown University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 1.0
Carleton University University Canada 2 2 0 0 0 1.0
Senshu University University Japan 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology University Saudi Arabia 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology University Korea, Republic of 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Lund University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
New York University University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Chinese University of Hong Kong University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
City University of Hong Kong University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Flatiron Institute Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Kobe University University Japan 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Linnaeus University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
The University of Texas at Dallas University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
The University of Texas at San Antonio University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE University Japan 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
University of Oldenburg University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
RaySearch Laboratories Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Aalto University University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) University India 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Kanagawa Univ NA Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Sorbonne Paris Cité University (USPC) University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
UNIV PARIS 09 NA France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Paris-Saclay University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Utrecht University University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
NA NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Twente University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Westalichen Wilhelms Univ Munster University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Xidian University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Badji Mokhtar University University Algeria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Kansas University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Palermo University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Los Alamos National Laboratory Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Nordita Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
RWTH Aachen University University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Stockholm University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Connecticut University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Massachusetts General Hospital University Hospital United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Copenhagen University Hospitals University Hospital Denmark 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Haukeland University Hospital University Hospital Norway 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Oslo University Hospital University Hospital Norway 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Bergen University Norway 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Oslo University Norway 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 11 8 3 2 2 1 3 72.7%
2015 11 7 2 1 2 2 4 63.6%
2016 15 7 0 1 3 3 8 46.7%
2017 11 8 1 3 2 2 3 72.7%
2018 7 7 0 0 6 1 0 100.0%
2019 12 9 2 0 6 1 3 75.0%
2020 24 16 2 1 12 1 8 66.7%
Total 91 62 10 8 33 11 29 68.1%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 4.4 22.1 5.1 0.0 0.0%
2015 3.7 22.4 6.1 0.3 9.1%
2016 6.6 20.2 3.1 2.2 32.9%
2017 4.7 18.4 3.9 2.6 55.4%
2018 3.2 17.6 5.5 0.0 0.0%
2019 4.9 5.3 1.1 3.5 72.6%
2020 8.8 9.5 1.1 4.0 45.5%
Total 36.2 115.5 3.2 12.6 34.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 8 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 92.9%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 13.6 0.68 0.8 6.1%
2015-2017 13.2 0.72 0.8 6.3%
2016-2018 12.9 0.70 1.5 11.6%
2017-2019 10.0 0.68 1.0 10.0%
Total 23.6 0.68 1.8 7.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 31 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 96.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 13.9 1.15 5.8 41.8%
2015-2017 13.3 1.21 6.2 46.2%
2016-2018 12.5 1.14 5.3 42.7%
2017-2019 11.4 1.40 5.1 44.7%
2018-2020 16.5 1.29 7.4 45.2%
Total 34.2 1.25 15.0 44.0%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 31 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 96.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 36 0 0.0% 22 61.1%
2015-2017 35 0 0.0% 22 62.9%
2016-2018 31 0 0.0% 17 54.8%
2017-2019 30 0 0.0% 17 56.7%
2018-2020 40 0 0.0% 24 60.0%
Total 87 0 0.0% 54 62.1%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 30 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 95.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row